Update: Linny: Just because I am the one using the term 'catastrophic' doesn't mean that I believe or promote it. Quite the opposite. I use the term to clarify what I am referring to or asking about. I am being kind. It is unkind to let people guess as to which 'global Warming' you are referring to. There is Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW), then there is Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) and also just Global Warming (GW). How long have you been on this site and still don't know that?
Update 2: You fellows remind me of a con artist. They use indefinite terms. For example"
Con Artist: "Give me $100 and I will give you car."
Sucker: "OK. Here it is."
Con artist gives the Sucker a toy car.
Can you see what I mean? Your type rely on ambiguity. Your actions are seedy at best. I don't in the life of me understand why you fellows are so bent out of shape by me being EXACT! Science is exact. I am a scientist. I deal with exactness for success.
This shows what kind of science you deal out