• Register
settingsLogin | Registersettings
Show Menu

Are The Promoters Of Global Warming 'Catastrophe' The True Deniers?

0 votes
Update: Linny: Just because I am the one using the term 'catastrophic' doesn't mean that I believe or promote it. Quite the opposite. I use the term to clarify what I am referring to or asking about. I am being kind. It is unkind to let people guess as to which 'global Warming' you are referring to. There is Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW), then there is Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) and also just Global Warming (GW). How long have you been on this site and still don't know that?
Update 2: You fellows remind me of a con artist. They use indefinite terms. For example"

Con Artist: "Give me $100 and I will give you car."

Sucker: "OK. Here it is."

Con artist gives the Sucker a toy car.

Can you see what I mean? Your type rely on ambiguity. Your actions are seedy at best. I don't in the life of me understand why you fellows are so bent out of shape by me being EXACT! Science is exact. I am a scientist. I deal with exactness for success.

This shows what kind of science you deal out
asked Oct 7, 2016 in Environment by smyadmin

1 Answer

0 votes
Honestly, if the world leaders and such were worried about CAGW as much as they claim, they would have come up with far more effective measures of combating global warming than a regressive tax scheme. AS IF, tax our way to a better tomorrow is a plan people would create if they were truly fearful.
answered Oct 7, 2016 by moscl

Related questions

Welcome to Koees Questions and Answers, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.